↓ Skip to main content

A comparison of early versus late initiation of renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
378 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
264 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A comparison of early versus late initiation of renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Critical Care, February 2011
DOI 10.1186/cc10061
Pubmed ID
Authors

Constantine J Karvellas, Maha R Farhat, Imran Sajjad, Simon S Mogensen, Alexander A Leung, Ron Wald, Sean M Bagshaw

Abstract

Our aim was to investigate the impact of early versus late initiation of renal replacement therapy (RRT) on clinical outcomes in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 264 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 5 2%
Japan 3 1%
Italy 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 245 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 39 15%
Other 38 14%
Researcher 38 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 21 8%
Other 73 28%
Unknown 28 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 194 73%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 <1%
Computer Science 2 <1%
Other 17 6%
Unknown 35 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2018.
All research outputs
#5,496,406
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,501
of 6,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,668
of 120,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#30
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,627 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.