↓ Skip to main content

Systemic administration of a novel human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells population accelerates the resolution of acute liver injury

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Gastroenterology, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Systemic administration of a novel human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells population accelerates the resolution of acute liver injury
Published in
BMC Gastroenterology, July 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-230x-12-88
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patrizia Burra, Diletta Arcidiacono, Debora Bizzaro, Tatiana Chioato, Rosa Di Liddo, Antara Banerjee, Andrea Cappon, Patrizio Bo, Maria Teresa Conconi, Pier Paolo Parnigotto, Silvia Mirandola, Enrico Gringeri, Amedeo Carraro, Umberto Cillo, Francesco Paolo Russo

Abstract

Hepatocytes and stem cells transplantation may be an alternative to liver transplantation in acute or chronic liver disease. We aimed to evaluate the therapeutic potential of mesenchymal stem cells from human umbilical cord (UCMSCs), a readily available source of mesenchymal stem cells, in the CCl4-induced acute liver injury model.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Sri Lanka 1 2%
Unknown 63 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 20%
Student > Master 12 18%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 14%
Chemistry 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 16 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2012.
All research outputs
#15,247,248
of 22,671,366 outputs
Outputs from BMC Gastroenterology
#827
of 1,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,989
of 164,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Gastroenterology
#23
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,671,366 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,724 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,330 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.