↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of a long-term use of a minimalist footwear versus habitual shoe on pain, function and mechanical loads in knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
23 X users
facebook
8 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
259 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effectiveness of a long-term use of a minimalist footwear versus habitual shoe on pain, function and mechanical loads in knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, July 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-13-121
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francis Trombini-Souza, Ricardo Fuller, Alessandra Matias, Mariane Yokota, Marco Butugan, Claudia Goldenstein-Schainberg, Isabel C N Sacco

Abstract

Recent studies have shown an important reduction of joint overload during locomotion in elderly women with knee osteoarthritis (OA) after short-term use of minimalist shoes. Our aim is to investigate the chronic effect of inexpensive and minimalist footwear on the clinical and functional aspects of OA and gait biomechanics of elderly women with knee OA.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 259 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 255 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 47 18%
Student > Bachelor 41 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 11%
Researcher 15 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Other 43 17%
Unknown 73 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 38 15%
Sports and Recreations 27 10%
Social Sciences 9 3%
Engineering 9 3%
Other 46 18%
Unknown 76 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2017.
All research outputs
#1,907,292
of 25,391,701 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#349
of 4,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,223
of 177,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#4
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,391,701 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,410 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.