↓ Skip to main content

Maternal iodine status, intrauterine growth, birth outcomes and congenital anomalies in a UK birth cohort

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Maternal iodine status, intrauterine growth, birth outcomes and congenital anomalies in a UK birth cohort
Published in
BMC Medicine, June 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12916-020-01602-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charles Jonathan Peter Snart, Diane Erin Threapleton, Claire Keeble, Elizabeth Taylor, Dagmar Waiblinger, Stephen Reid, Nisreen A. Alwan, Dan Mason, Rafaq Azad, Janet Elizabeth Cade, Nigel A. B. Simpson, Sarah Meadows, Amanda McKillion, Gillian Santorelli, Amanda H. Waterman, Michael Zimmermann, Paul M. Stewart, John Wright, Mark Mon-Williams, Darren Charles Greenwood, Laura J. Hardie

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Student > Master 4 6%
Student > Postgraduate 3 4%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 33 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Engineering 2 3%
Unspecified 1 1%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 33 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2020.
All research outputs
#15,635,524
of 24,769,082 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#3,248
of 3,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,926
of 403,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#93
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,769,082 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,834 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.8. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,829 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.