You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Suicide prevention in primary care: General practitioners' views on service availability
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Research Notes, October 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1756-0500-3-246 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pooja Saini, Kirsten Windfuhr, Anna Pearson, Damian Da Cruz, Caroline Miles, Lis Cordingley, David While, Nicola Swinson, Alyson Williams, Jenny Shaw, Louis Appleby, Navneet Kapur |
| Abstract |
Primary care may be a key setting for suicide prevention. However, comparatively little is known about the services available in primary care for suicide prevention. The aims of the current study were to describe services available in general practices for the management of suicidal patients and to examine GPs views on these services. We carried out a questionnaire and interview study in the North West of England. We collected data on GPs views of suicide prevention generally as well as local mental health service provision. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 32 | 64% |
| Canada | 3 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 12 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 34 | 68% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 8% |
| Scientists | 4 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 40 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 17% |
| Researcher | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 15% |
| Unknown | 11 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 12 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 13 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2014.
All research outputs
#1,119,426
of 25,634,695 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#113
of 4,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,396
of 108,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#2
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,634,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,825 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.