↓ Skip to main content

Inherent bacterial DNA contamination of extraction and sequencing reagents may affect interpretation of microbiota in low bacterial biomass samples

Overview of attention for article published in Gut Pathogens, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#23 of 614)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
22 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
415 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
449 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inherent bacterial DNA contamination of extraction and sequencing reagents may affect interpretation of microbiota in low bacterial biomass samples
Published in
Gut Pathogens, May 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13099-016-0103-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angela Glassing, Scot E. Dowd, Susan Galandiuk, Brian Davis, Rodrick J. Chiodini

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 449 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
France 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
New Zealand 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Unknown 432 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 106 24%
Researcher 76 17%
Student > Master 66 15%
Student > Bachelor 51 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 4%
Other 47 10%
Unknown 83 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 116 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 94 21%
Immunology and Microbiology 49 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 32 7%
Environmental Science 16 4%
Other 41 9%
Unknown 101 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2020.
All research outputs
#1,634,042
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Gut Pathogens
#23
of 614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,801
of 356,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gut Pathogens
#2
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 614 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.