You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bayesian alternatives to null hypothesis significance testing in biomedical research: a non-technical introduction to Bayesian inference with JASP
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-020-00980-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Riko Kelter |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 10% |
| Morocco | 1 | 10% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 5 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 147 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 14% |
| Researcher | 20 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 34 | 23% |
| Unknown | 39 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 24 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 39 | 27% |
| Unknown | 50 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2020.
All research outputs
#4,789,382
of 23,213,531 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#759
of 2,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,264
of 398,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#42
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,213,531 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,051 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,014 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.