You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Cryptococcal antigenemia and its predictors among HIV infected patients in resource limited settings: a systematic review
BMC Infectious Diseases, June 2020
Awoke Derbie, Daniel Mekonnen, Yimtubezinash Woldeamanuel, Tamrat Abebe
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Bachelor||9||14%|
|Student > Master||7||11%|
|Student > Postgraduate||6||9%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||4||6%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||16||25%|
|Immunology and Microbiology||5||8%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||4||6%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||3||5%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||3||5%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2020.
All research outputs
of 23,213,531 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
of 7,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 399,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
of 148 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,213,531 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,784 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,067 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 148 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.