You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Can an electronic monitoring system capture implementation of health promotion programs? A focussed ethnographic exploration of the story behind program monitoring data
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, June 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12889-020-08644-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kathleen Conte, Leah Marks, Victoria Loblay, Sisse Grøn, Amanda Green, Christine Innes-Hughes, Andrew Milat, Lina Persson, Mandy Williams, Sarah Thackway, Jo Mitchell, Penelope Hawe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Ireland | 1 | 33% |
Australia | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 2 | 67% |
Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 5 | 23% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 9% |
Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 5% |
Professor | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 9% |
Unknown | 10 | 45% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 23% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 18% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 9% |
Computer Science | 1 | 5% |
Linguistics | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 8 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2020.
All research outputs
#13,444,832
of 23,213,531 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#9,477
of 15,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,847
of 399,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#239
of 386 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,213,531 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,175 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 386 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.