↓ Skip to main content

European consensus statement on diagnosis and treatment of adult ADHD: The European Network Adult ADHD

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
36 tweeters
patent
1 patent
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
23 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
599 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1006 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
European consensus statement on diagnosis and treatment of adult ADHD: The European Network Adult ADHD
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, September 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-244x-10-67
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sandra JJ Kooij, Susanne Bejerot, Andrew Blackwell, Herve Caci, Miquel Casas-Brugué, Pieter J Carpentier, Dan Edvinsson, John Fayyad, Karin Foeken, Michael Fitzgerald, Veronique Gaillac, Ylva Ginsberg, Chantal Henry, Johanna Krause, Michael B Lensing, Iris Manor, Helmut Niederhofer, Carlos Nunes-Filipe, Martin D Ohlmeier, Pierre Oswald, Stefano Pallanti, Artemios Pehlivanidis, Josep A Ramos-Quiroga, Maria Rastam, Doris Ryffel-Rawak, Steven Stes, Philip Asherson

Abstract

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is among the most common psychiatric disorders of childhood that persists into adulthood in the majority of cases. The evidence on persistence poses several difficulties for adult psychiatry considering the lack of expertise for diagnostic assessment, limited treatment options and patient facilities across Europe.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,006 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 6 <1%
United States 4 <1%
Spain 4 <1%
Sweden 4 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Other 16 2%
Unknown 960 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 190 19%
Student > Bachelor 139 14%
Researcher 119 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 107 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 73 7%
Other 240 24%
Unknown 138 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 290 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 254 25%
Neuroscience 54 5%
Social Sciences 51 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 5%
Other 130 13%
Unknown 181 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2022.
All research outputs
#496,331
of 21,170,346 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#116
of 4,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,478
of 142,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,170,346 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,324 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them