↓ Skip to main content

Inequalities, harm reduction and non-combustible nicotine products: a meta-ethnography of qualitative evidence

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inequalities, harm reduction and non-combustible nicotine products: a meta-ethnography of qualitative evidence
Published in
BMC Public Health, June 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12889-020-09083-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark Lucherini, Sarah Hill, Katherine Smith

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 19%
Researcher 9 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Student > Master 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 19 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 7 13%
Social Sciences 6 12%
Psychology 4 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 19 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2020.
All research outputs
#7,037,849
of 23,215,490 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,414
of 15,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,580
of 398,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#191
of 378 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,215,490 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 378 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.