↓ Skip to main content

Validity and reliability of subjective methods to assess sedentary behaviour in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
51 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Validity and reliability of subjective methods to assess sedentary behaviour in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, June 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12966-020-00972-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Esmée A. Bakker, Yvonne A. W. Hartman, Maria T. E. Hopman, Nicola D. Hopkins, Lee E. F. Graves, David W. Dunstan, Genevieve N. Healy, Thijs M. H. Eijsvogels, Dick H. J. Thijssen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 74 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 19%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Student > Master 8 11%
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 20 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 10 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 9%
Psychology 7 9%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 29 39%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2021.
All research outputs
#713,613
of 18,905,383 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#283
of 1,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,930
of 252,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,905,383 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,741 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them