You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A comparison of two personalization and adaptive cognitive rehabilitation approaches: a randomized controlled trial with chronic stroke patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12984-020-00691-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ana Lúcia Faria, Maria Salomé Pinho, Sergi Bermúdez i Badia |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Portugal | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 212 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 8% |
| Researcher | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 29 | 14% |
| Unknown | 110 | 52% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 10% |
| Psychology | 20 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 4% |
| Engineering | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 9% |
| Unknown | 117 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2020.
All research outputs
#13,607,193
of 23,215,490 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#650
of 1,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,633
of 372,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#20
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,215,490 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.