↓ Skip to main content

Mowat-Wilson syndrome: growth charts

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mowat-Wilson syndrome: growth charts
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, June 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13023-020-01418-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ivan Ivanovski, Olivera Djuric, Serena Broccoli, Stefano Giuseppe Caraffi, Patrizia Accorsi, Margaret P. Adam, Kristina Avela, Magdalena Badura-Stronka, Allan Bayat, Jill Clayton-Smith, Isabella Cocco, Duccio Maria Cordelli, Goran Cuturilo, Veronica Di Pisa, Juliette Dupont Garcia, Roberto Gastaldi, Lucio Giordano, Andrea Guala, Christina Hoei-Hansen, Mie Inaba, Alessandro Iodice, Jens Erik Klint Nielsen, Vladimir Kuburovic, Brissia Lazalde-Medina, Baris Malbora, Seiji Mizuno, Oana Moldovan, Rikke S. Møller, Petra Muschke, Valeria Otelli, Chiara Pantaleoni, Carmelo Piscopo, Maria Luisa Poch-Olive, Igor Prpic, Purificación Marín Reina, Federico Raviglione, Emilia Ricci, Emanuela Scarano, Graziella Simonte, Robert Smigiel, George Tanteles, Luigi Tarani, Aurelien Trimouille, Elvis Terci Valera, Samantha Schrier Vergano, Karin Writzl, Bert Callewaert, Salvatore Savasta, Maria Elisabeth Street, Lorenzo Iughetti, Sergio Bernasconi, Paolo Giorgi Rossi, Livia Garavelli

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 19%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Student > Master 4 8%
Other 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 20 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Psychology 3 6%
Philosophy 1 2%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 22 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2021.
All research outputs
#4,680,596
of 23,215,490 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#634
of 2,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,875
of 398,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#14
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,215,490 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,665 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.