| Title |
The ARDSnet protocol may be detrimental in COVID-19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-03081-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vasiliki Tsolaki, George E. Zakynthinos, Dimosthenis Makris |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 76 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 5% |
| Mexico | 3 | 4% |
| Brazil | 3 | 4% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| India | 2 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Singapore | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 41 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 58 | 76% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 16 | 21% |
| Scientists | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 79 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Researcher | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 22 | 28% |
| Unknown | 17 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 42% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 22 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2023.
All research outputs
#875,906
of 25,721,020 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#650
of 6,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,745
of 422,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#29
of 225 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,721,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,611 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 225 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.