↓ Skip to main content

To screen or not to screen: an interactive framework for comparing costs of mass malaria treatment interventions

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
To screen or not to screen: an interactive framework for comparing costs of mass malaria treatment interventions
Published in
BMC Medicine, June 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12916-020-01609-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Justin Millar, Kok Ben Toh, Denis Valle

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Student > Master 5 13%
Lecturer 2 5%
Researcher 2 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 18 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 8%
Arts and Humanities 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 18 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2020.
All research outputs
#14,486,138
of 23,215,490 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#2,986
of 3,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,342
of 399,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#96
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,215,490 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,494 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.7. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,265 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.