↓ Skip to main content

Prevention of thrombotic risk in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and hemostasis monitoring

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
140 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
249 Mendeley
Title
Prevention of thrombotic risk in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and hemostasis monitoring
Published in
Critical Care, June 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13054-020-03000-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sophie Susen, Charles Ambroise Tacquard, Alexandre Godon, Alexandre Mansour, Delphine Garrigue, Philippe Nguyen, Anne Godier, Sophie Testa, Jerrold H. Levy, Pierre Albaladejo, Yves Gruel, P. Albaladejo, N. Blais, F. Bonhomme, A. Borel-Derlon, A. Cohen, J.-P. Collet, E. de Maistre, P. Fontana, D. Garrigue Huet, A. Godier, Y. Gruel, A. Godon, B. Ickx, S. Laporte, D. Lasne, J. Llau, G. Le Gal, T. Lecompte, S. Lessire, J. H. Levy, D. Longrois, S. Madi-Jebara, A. Mansour, M. Mazighi, P. Mismetti, P. E. Morange, S. Motte, F. Mullier, N. Nathan, P. Nguyen, G. Pernod, N. Rosencher, S. Roullet, P. M. Roy, S. Schlumberger, P. Sié, A. Steib, S. Susen, C. A. Tacquard, S. Testa, A. Vincentelli, P. Zufferey, A. Borel-Derlon, E. Boissier, B. Dumont, E. de Maistre, Y. Gruel, C. James, D. Lasne, T. Lecompte, P. E. Morange, P. Nguyen, V. Siguret, S. Susen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 140 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 249 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 249 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 14%
Student > Bachelor 27 11%
Other 22 9%
Student > Master 22 9%
Student > Postgraduate 19 8%
Other 58 23%
Unknown 67 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 110 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Other 16 6%
Unknown 78 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 101. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2021.
All research outputs
#271,853
of 19,039,850 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#163
of 5,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,489
of 300,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,039,850 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,551 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them