↓ Skip to main content

What makes it work? Exploring experiences of patient research partners and researchers involved in a long-term co-creative research collaboration

Overview of attention for article published in Research Involvement and Engagement, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
25 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What makes it work? Exploring experiences of patient research partners and researchers involved in a long-term co-creative research collaboration
Published in
Research Involvement and Engagement, June 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40900-020-00207-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emma Hovén, Lars Eriksson, Åsa Månsson D’Souza, Johanna Sörensen, David Hill, Carolin Viklund, Lena Wettergren, Claudia Lampic

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 20%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Librarian 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 12 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 17%
Social Sciences 4 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Computer Science 2 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 11 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2020.
All research outputs
#2,299,827
of 24,363,506 outputs
Outputs from Research Involvement and Engagement
#200
of 444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,964
of 403,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Involvement and Engagement
#13
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,363,506 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 444 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,265 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.