You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
What makes it work? Exploring experiences of patient research partners and researchers involved in a long-term co-creative research collaboration
|
---|---|
Published in |
Research Involvement and Engagement, June 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40900-020-00207-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Emma Hovén, Lars Eriksson, Åsa Månsson D’Souza, Johanna Sörensen, David Hill, Carolin Viklund, Lena Wettergren, Claudia Lampic |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 9 | 36% |
Canada | 5 | 20% |
Ireland | 3 | 12% |
United States | 1 | 4% |
New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 6 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 12 | 48% |
Scientists | 9 | 36% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 12% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 6 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 20% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 7% |
Librarian | 1 | 3% |
Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 12 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 17% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
Computer Science | 2 | 7% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 17% |
Unknown | 11 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2020.
All research outputs
#2,299,827
of 24,363,506 outputs
Outputs from Research Involvement and Engagement
#200
of 444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,964
of 403,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Involvement and Engagement
#13
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,363,506 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 444 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,265 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.