↓ Skip to main content

Probiotics and microbiota composition

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
17 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Probiotics and microbiota composition
Published in
BMC Medicine, June 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12916-016-0629-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mary Ellen Sanders

Abstract

Accumulated evidence, corroborated by a new systematic review by Kristensen et al. (Genome Med 8:52, 2016), suggests that probiotics do not significantly impact the fecal microbiota composition of healthy subjects. Nevertheless, physiological benefits have been associated with probiotic consumption by healthy people. Some studies have suggested that probiotics may impact the function of colonizing microbes, although this needs to be further studied. An alternative hypothesis is that probiotics may promote homeostasis of the gut microbiota, rather than change its composition. This hypothesis warrants investigation as a possible mechanism for how probiotics may benefit healthy people.Please see related article: http://genomemedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13073-016-0300-5 .

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Spain 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 116 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 28 23%
Student > Master 20 17%
Researcher 17 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 13%
Other 7 6%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 15 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 22 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2017.
All research outputs
#1,514,340
of 17,873,421 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,108
of 2,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,535
of 274,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,873,421 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,746 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,571 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them