You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Sex differences in the relationship between dietary pattern adherence and cognitive function among older adults: findings from the NuAge study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12937-020-00575-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Danielle D’Amico, Matthew D. Parrott, Carol E. Greenwood, Guylaine Ferland, Pierrette Gaudreau, Sylvie Belleville, Danielle Laurin, Nicole D. Anderson, Marie-Jeanne Kergoat, Jose A. Morais, Nancy Presse, Alexandra J. Fiocco |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 5 | 63% |
| United States | 2 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
| Scientists | 4 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 17% |
| Researcher | 5 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 3% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 12 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 10% |
| Engineering | 2 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 7% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 12 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,107,755
of 23,081,466 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#502
of 1,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,153
of 398,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#9
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,081,466 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,439 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.