↓ Skip to main content

AGILE-ACCORD: A Randomized, Multicentre, Seamless, Adaptive Phase I/II Platform Study to Determine the Optimal Dose, Safety and Efficacy of Multiple Candidate Agents for the Treatment of COVID-19: A…

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
Title
AGILE-ACCORD: A Randomized, Multicentre, Seamless, Adaptive Phase I/II Platform Study to Determine the Optimal Dose, Safety and Efficacy of Multiple Candidate Agents for the Treatment of COVID-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised platform trial
Published in
Trials, June 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13063-020-04473-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gareth Griffiths, Richard Fitzgerald, Thomas Jaki, Andrea Corkhill, Ellice Marwood, Helen Reynolds, Louise Stanton, Sean Ewings, Susannah Condie, Emma Wrixon, Andrea Norton, Mike Radford, Sara Yeats, Jane Robertson, Rachel Darby-Dowman, Lauren Walker, Saye Khoo

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 188 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 17%
Student > Bachelor 28 15%
Other 15 8%
Student > Master 15 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 5%
Other 31 16%
Unknown 58 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 4%
Psychology 6 3%
Other 29 15%
Unknown 70 37%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2020.
All research outputs
#14,392,338
of 18,034,577 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#3,808
of 4,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,488
of 297,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,034,577 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,729 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them