↓ Skip to main content

A comparative transcriptomic, fluxomic and metabolomic analysis of the response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to increases in NADPH oxidation

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A comparative transcriptomic, fluxomic and metabolomic analysis of the response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to increases in NADPH oxidation
Published in
BMC Genomics, July 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-13-317
Pubmed ID
Authors

Magalie Celton, Isabelle Sanchez, Anne Goelzer, Vincent Fromion, Carole Camarasa, Sylvie Dequin

Abstract

Redox homeostasis is essential to sustain metabolism and growth. We recently reported that yeast cells meet a gradual increase in imposed NADPH demand by progressively increasing flux through the pentose phosphate (PP) and acetate pathways and by exchanging NADH for NADPH in the cytosol, via a transhydrogenase-like cycle. Here, we studied the mechanisms underlying this metabolic response, through a combination of gene expression profiling and analyses of extracellular and intracellular metabolites and 13 C-flux analysis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 3 2%
Switzerland 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Australia 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 133 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 46 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 27%
Student > Master 14 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 4%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 18 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 74 49%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 16%
Engineering 11 7%
Chemical Engineering 5 3%
Computer Science 5 3%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 18 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2012.
All research outputs
#3,074,134
of 22,671,366 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#1,150
of 10,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,954
of 143,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#10
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,671,366 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,614 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.