↓ Skip to main content

Real-time cardiovascular magnetic resonance T1 and extracellular volume fraction mapping for tissue characterisation in aortic stenosis

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Real-time cardiovascular magnetic resonance T1 and extracellular volume fraction mapping for tissue characterisation in aortic stenosis
Published in
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, June 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12968-020-00632-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sören J. Backhaus, Torben Lange, Bo Eric Beuthner, Rodi Topci, Xiaoqing Wang, Johannes T. Kowallick, Joachim Lotz, Tim Seidler, Karl Toischer, Elisabeth M. Zeisberg, Miriam Puls, Claudius Jacobshagen, Martin Uecker, Gerd Hasenfuß, Andreas Schuster

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 21%
Student > Master 6 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Other 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 8 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Engineering 2 7%
Physics and Astronomy 2 7%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 13 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2020.
All research outputs
#7,316,465
of 25,523,622 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#558
of 1,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,904
of 435,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#14
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,523,622 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.