You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Programmatic options for monitoring malaria in elimination settings: easy access group surveys to investigate Plasmodium falciparum epidemiology in two regions with differing endemicity in Haiti
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12916-020-01611-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas Druetz, Gillian Stresman, Ruth A. Ashton, Lotus L. van den Hoogen, Vena Joseph, Carl Fayette, Frank Monestime, Karen E. Hamre, Michelle A. Chang, Jean F. Lemoine, Chris Drakeley, Thomas P. Eisele |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 60% |
| Panama | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 18% |
| Researcher | 6 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 11% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 12 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 15 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2020.
All research outputs
#6,718,481
of 22,833,393 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#2,442
of 3,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,697
of 398,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#78
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,833,393 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,430 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.6. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.