↓ Skip to main content

Duplications involving the long range HMX1 enhancer are associated with human isolated bilateral concha-type microtia

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Duplications involving the long range HMX1 enhancer are associated with human isolated bilateral concha-type microtia
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, June 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12967-020-02409-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nuo Si, Xiaolu Meng, Xiaosheng Lu, Zhe Liu, Zhan Qi, Lianqing Wang, Chuan Li, Meirong Yang, Ye Zhang, Changchen Wang, Peipei Guo, Lingdong Zhu, Lei Liu, Zhengyong Li, Zhenyu Zhang, Zhen Cai, Bo Pan, Haiyue Jiang, Xue Zhang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 17%
Unspecified 2 11%
Student > Postgraduate 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Researcher 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 9 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 17%
Unspecified 2 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 11%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2020.
All research outputs
#10,822,662
of 18,017,546 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#1,476
of 3,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,871
of 298,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,017,546 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,006 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them