↓ Skip to main content

School-level economic disadvantage and obesity in middle school children in central Texas, USA: a cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
School-level economic disadvantage and obesity in middle school children in central Texas, USA: a cross-sectional study
Published in
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, July 2015
DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-12-s1-s8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew E Springer, Linlin Li, Nalini Ranjit, Joanne Delk, Kajal Mehta, Steven H Kelder

Abstract

Although children of lower socio-economic status (SES) in the United States have generally been found to be at greater risk for obesity, the SES-obesity association varies when stratified by racial/ethnic groups-with no consistent association found for African American and Hispanic children. Research on contextual and setting-related factors may provide further insights into ethnic and SES disparities in obesity. We examined whether obesity levels among central Texas 8th grade students (n=2682) vary by school-level economic disadvantage across individual-level family SES and racial/ethnicity groups. As a secondary aim, we compared the association of school-level economic disadvantage and obesity by language spoken with parents (English or Spanish) among Hispanic students.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 109 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 16%
Student > Master 17 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Researcher 11 10%
Other 19 17%
Unknown 20 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 27 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 19%
Social Sciences 11 10%
Psychology 5 5%
Sports and Recreations 4 4%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 24 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2017.
All research outputs
#5,488,562
of 22,876,619 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#1,350
of 1,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,672
of 263,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#32
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,876,619 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,935 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.7. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.