| Title |
Applying critical systems thinking to social prescribing: a relational model of stakeholder “buy-in”
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12913-020-05443-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alison Fixsen, Helen Seers, Marie Polley, Jo Robins |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 17 | 55% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 71% |
| Scientists | 7 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 168 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 10% |
| Researcher | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 33 | 20% |
| Unknown | 56 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 21 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 12 | 7% |
| Psychology | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 24 | 14% |
| Unknown | 69 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2020.
All research outputs
#1,502,664
of 24,576,899 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#488
of 8,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,453
of 404,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#13
of 220 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,576,899 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,308 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 220 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.