↓ Skip to main content

Born to run. Studying the limits of human performance

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
34 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Born to run. Studying the limits of human performance
Published in
BMC Medicine, July 2012
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-10-76
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew Murray, Ricardo JS Costa

Abstract

It is recognised that regular physical activity and a high level of fitness are powerful predictors of positive health outcomes. There is a long and rich history of significant feats of human endurance with some, for example, the death of the first marathon runner, Pheidippides, associated with negative health outcomes. Early studies on endurance running used X-ray and interview techniques to evaluate competitors and comment on performance. Since then, comparatively few studies have looked at runners competing in distances longer than a marathon. Those that have, tend to show significant musculoskeletal injuries and a remarkable level of adaptation to this endurance load. The TransEurope Footrace Project followed ultra-endurance runners aiming to complete 4,500 Km of running in 64 days across Europe. This pioneering study will assess the impact of extreme endurance on human physiology; analysing musculoskeletal and other tissue/organ injuries, and the body's potential ability to adapt to extreme physiological stress. The results will be of interest not only to endurance runners, but to anyone interested in the limits of human performance. Please see related article: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/10/78.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
Brazil 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Unknown 93 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 23%
Student > Master 15 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Professor 8 8%
Other 22 22%
Unknown 8 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 37 37%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 12 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2019.
All research outputs
#665,374
of 19,208,681 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#507
of 2,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,714
of 138,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,208,681 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,870 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 138,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them