You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A scoping review of evaluation frameworks and their applicability to real-world physical activity and dietary change programme evaluation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-020-09062-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Judith F. Fynn, Wendy Hardeman, Karen Milton, Andy P. Jones |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 40% |
| Australia | 2 | 13% |
| Ireland | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 47% |
| Scientists | 6 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 135 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 11% |
| Researcher | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 13% |
| Unknown | 62 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 9% |
| Psychology | 6 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 13% |
| Unknown | 69 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2023.
All research outputs
#3,204,020
of 25,345,468 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#3,826
of 16,998 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,397
of 407,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#83
of 377 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,345,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,998 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 407,056 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 377 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.