You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Applying an intersectionality lens to the theoretical domains framework: a tool for thinking about how intersecting social identities and structures of power influence behaviour
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-020-01056-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cole Etherington, Isabel Braganca Rodrigues, Lora Giangregorio, Ian D. Graham, Alison M. Hoens, Danielle Kasperavicius, Christine Kelly, Julia E. Moore, Matteo Ponzano, Justin Presseau, Kathryn M. Sibley, Sharon Straus |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 29 | 45% |
| Ireland | 5 | 8% |
| Australia | 4 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 6% |
| United States | 3 | 5% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 17 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 32 | 49% |
| Scientists | 26 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 140 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 11% |
| Unknown | 46 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 18 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 10% |
| Psychology | 8 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 22 | 16% |
| Unknown | 59 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,048,853
of 25,508,813 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#102
of 2,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,027
of 434,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#4
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,508,813 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,289 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.