You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Influence of nutrient intake on antioxidant capacity, muscle damage and white blood cell count in female soccer players
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1550-2783-9-32 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Leyre Gravina, Fatima Ruiz, Elena Diaz, Jose Antonio Lekue, Aduna Badiola, Jon Irazusta, Susana Maria Gil |
| Abstract |
Soccer is a form of exercise that induces inflammatory response, as well as an increase in free radicals potentially leading to muscle injury. Balanced nutritional intake provides important antioxidant vitamins, including vitamins A, C and E, which may assist in preventing exercise-related muscle damage. The purpose of the present study was to determine the effect of macro/micronutrient intake on markers of oxidative stress, muscle damage, inflammatory and immune response in female soccer players. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Spain | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 44% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 44% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Qatar | 1 | <1% |
| Iraq | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 156 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Researcher | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 29 | 18% |
| Unknown | 35 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 53 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 10% |
| Unknown | 39 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2014.
All research outputs
#4,078,022
of 22,671,366 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#537
of 882 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,106
of 437,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#519
of 849 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,671,366 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 882 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.4. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,591 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 849 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.