You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Study protocol for POSITIF, a randomised multicentre feasibility trial of a brief cognitive-behavioural intervention plus information versus information alone for the treatment of post-stroke fatigue
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40814-020-00622-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David C. Gillespie, Mark Barber, Marian C. Brady, Alan Carson, Trudie Chalder, Yvonne Chun, Vera Cvoro, Martin Dennis, Maree Hackett, Euan Haig, Allan House, Steff Lewis, Richard Parker, Fiona Wee, Simiao Wu, Gillian Mead |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 62 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 15 | 24% |
| United States | 3 | 5% |
| Comoros | 2 | 3% |
| Norway | 2 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Guinea | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 29 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 54 | 87% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 10% |
| Scientists | 1 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 25 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 12% |
| Psychology | 7 | 12% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 29 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,061,547
of 25,556,408 outputs
Outputs from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#29
of 1,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,576
of 434,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#2
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,556,408 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,237 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,289 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.