↓ Skip to main content

Visual laterality in dolphins: importance of the familiarity of stimuli

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Neuroscience, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Visual laterality in dolphins: importance of the familiarity of stimuli
Published in
BMC Neuroscience, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2202-13-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catherine Blois-Heulin, Mélodie Crével, Martin Böye, Alban Lemasson

Abstract

Many studies of cerebral asymmetries in different species lead, on the one hand, to a better understanding of the functions of each cerebral hemisphere and, on the other hand, to develop an evolutionary history of hemispheric laterality. Our animal model is particularly interesting because of its original evolutionary path, i.e. return to aquatic life after a terrestrial phase. The rare reports concerning visual laterality of marine mammals investigated mainly discrimination processes. As dolphins are migrant species they are confronted to a changing environment. Being able to categorize new versus familiar objects would allow dolphins a rapid adaptation to novel environments. Visual laterality could be a prerequisite to this adaptability. To date, no study, to our knowledge, has analyzed the environmental factors that could influence their visual laterality.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Poland 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 100 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 21%
Researcher 21 20%
Other 18 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 9 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 50%
Environmental Science 11 11%
Psychology 8 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 6%
Neuroscience 4 4%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 11 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2022.
All research outputs
#5,263,644
of 25,278,281 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neuroscience
#230
of 1,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,969
of 255,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neuroscience
#2
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,278,281 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,291 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,032 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.