You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Citizen science or scientific citizenship? Disentangling the uses of public engagement rhetoric in national research initiatives
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12910-016-0117-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J. Patrick Woolley, Michelle L. McGowan, Harriet J. A. Teare, Victoria Coathup, Jennifer R. Fishman, Richard A. Settersten, Sigrid Sterckx, Jane Kaye, Eric T. Juengst |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 101 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 19 | 19% |
| Canada | 12 | 12% |
| United States | 7 | 7% |
| Spain | 4 | 4% |
| Belgium | 3 | 3% |
| Germany | 3 | 3% |
| Sweden | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 33 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 60 | 59% |
| Scientists | 27 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 10 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 196 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 17% |
| Researcher | 29 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 28 | 14% |
| Unknown | 59 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 38 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 14 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 13 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 45 | 23% |
| Unknown | 63 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 80. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2017.
All research outputs
#542,352
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#28
of 1,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,505
of 355,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,118 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,245 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.