You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assessing the efficiency of Iran health system in making progress towards universal health coverage: a comparative panel data analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12962-020-00215-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Haniye Sadat Sajadi, Zahra Goodarzi, Amirhossein Takian, Efat Mohamadi, Alireza Olyaeemanesh, Farhad Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, Hamid Sharafi, Somayeh Noori Hekmat, Matthew Jowett, Reza Majdzadeh |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
| Researcher | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 31 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 12% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 8 | 12% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 30 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2023.
All research outputs
#5,452,126
of 25,391,701 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#193
of 534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,384
of 433,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,391,701 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 534 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.