↓ Skip to main content

Do supplemental perches influence electrocution risk for diurnal raptors?

Overview of attention for article published in Avian Research, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Do supplemental perches influence electrocution risk for diurnal raptors?
Published in
Avian Research, June 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40657-020-00206-9
Authors

Roberto Sánchez, Javier Sánchez, Javier Oria, Francisco Guil

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 1 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 20%
Social Sciences 1 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2020.
All research outputs
#15,962,768
of 18,068,324 outputs
Outputs from Avian Research
#183
of 193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#249,653
of 296,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Avian Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,068,324 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them