↓ Skip to main content

Reminiscence groups for people with dementia and their family carers: pragmatic eight-centre randomised trial of joint reminiscence and maintenance versus usual treatment: a protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reminiscence groups for people with dementia and their family carers: pragmatic eight-centre randomised trial of joint reminiscence and maintenance versus usual treatment: a protocol
Published in
Trials, July 2009
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-10-64
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert T Woods, Errollyn Bruce, Rhiannon T Edwards, Barry Hounsome, John Keady, Esme D Moniz-Cook, Martin Orrell, Ian T Russell

Abstract

The growing number of people with dementia, and the increasing cost of care, provides a major incentive to develop and test methods of supporting them in the community for longer. Most attention has been given to pharmacological interventions, but there is increasing recognition that psychosocial interventions may be equally effective, even preferable where medication has negative side-effects. Reminiscence groups, run by professionals and volunteers, which use photographs, recordings and other objects to trigger personal memories are probably the most popular therapeutic approach to working with people with dementia, but there is little evidence for their effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. The recent inclusion of family carers in groups with people with dementia, notably in our own pilot studies, has generated informal evidence that this joint approach improves relationships between people with dementia and their carers, and benefits both.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 185 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 17%
Student > Master 32 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 14%
Student > Bachelor 18 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 7%
Other 38 20%
Unknown 31 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 43 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 13%
Social Sciences 24 13%
Unspecified 8 4%
Other 25 13%
Unknown 39 20%