↓ Skip to main content

Paraquat and Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review protocol according to the OHAT approach for hazard identification

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Paraquat and Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review protocol according to the OHAT approach for hazard identification
Published in
Systematic Reviews, May 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13643-017-0491-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carolina Vaccari, Regina El Dib, João Lauro V. de Camargo

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 113 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 15%
Researcher 16 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Other 6 5%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 34 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 12%
Neuroscience 11 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 6%
Other 25 22%
Unknown 32 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2023.
All research outputs
#14,128,319
of 24,160,198 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,458
of 2,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,890
of 313,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#27
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,160,198 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,100 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,690 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.