↓ Skip to main content

Paraquat and Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review protocol according to the OHAT approach for hazard identification

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Paraquat and Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review protocol according to the OHAT approach for hazard identification
Published in
Systematic Reviews, May 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13643-017-0491-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carolina Vaccari, Regina El Dib, João Lauro V. de Camargo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 121 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 15%
Researcher 16 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Other 7 6%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 37 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 12%
Neuroscience 11 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 6%
Other 25 20%
Unknown 38 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2023.
All research outputs
#8,112,286
of 25,038,941 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,387
of 2,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,313
of 315,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#17
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,038,941 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,184 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.