↓ Skip to main content

Paraquat and Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review protocol according to the OHAT approach for hazard identification

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Paraquat and Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review protocol according to the OHAT approach for hazard identification
Published in
Systematic Reviews, May 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13643-017-0491-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carolina Vaccari, Regina El Dib, João Lauro V. de Camargo

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 105 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 16%
Researcher 14 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Other 5 5%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 31 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 12%
Neuroscience 10 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Other 26 25%
Unknown 29 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2022.
All research outputs
#12,835,136
of 21,769,404 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,351
of 1,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,901
of 306,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,769,404 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,890 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them