You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
L-Carnitine-supplementation in advanced pancreatic cancer (CARPAN) - a randomized multicentre trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nutrition Journal, July 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-11-52 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Matthias Kraft, Kathleen Kraft, Simone Gärtner, Julia Mayerle, Peter Simon, Eckhard Weber, Kerstin Schütte, Jens Stieler, Heide Koula-Jenik, Peter Holzhauer, Uwe Gröber, Georg Engel, Cornelia Müller, You-Shan Feng, Ali Aghdassi, Claudia Nitsche, Peter Malfertheiner, Maciej Patrzyk, Thomas Kohlmann, Markus M Lerch |
Abstract |
Cachexia, a >10% loss of body-weight, is one factor determining the poor prognosis of pancreatic cancer. Deficiency of L-Carnitine has been proposed to cause cancer cachexia. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
Spain | 1 | 13% |
Canada | 1 | 13% |
United States | 1 | 13% |
Brazil | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
Scientists | 2 | 25% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 1 | <1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 162 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 25 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 20 | 12% |
Student > Master | 17 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 8% |
Other | 12 | 7% |
Other | 36 | 22% |
Unknown | 41 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 28% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 7% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 3% |
Other | 20 | 12% |
Unknown | 50 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2018.
All research outputs
#4,078,022
of 22,671,366 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#705
of 1,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,336
of 164,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#11
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,671,366 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,422 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.