↓ Skip to main content

Sets2Networks: network inference from repeated observations of sets

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Systems Biology, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sets2Networks: network inference from repeated observations of sets
Published in
BMC Systems Biology, July 2012
DOI 10.1186/1752-0509-6-89
Pubmed ID
Authors

Neil R Clark, Ruth Dannenfelser, Christopher M Tan, Michael E Komosinski, Avi Ma'ayan

Abstract

The skeleton of complex systems can be represented as networks where vertices represent entities, and edges represent the relations between these entities. Often it is impossible, or expensive, to determine the network structure by experimental validation of the binary interactions between every vertex pair. It is usually more practical to infer the network from surrogate observations. Network inference is the process by which an underlying network of relations between entities is determined from indirect evidence. While many algorithms have been developed to infer networks from quantitative data, less attention has been paid to methods which infer networks from repeated co-occurrence of entities in related sets. This type of data is ubiquitous in the field of systems biology and in other areas of complex systems research. Hence, such methods would be of great utility and value.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 7%
Germany 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 92 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 25%
Student > Master 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 8%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 5 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 20%
Computer Science 15 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 8%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 8 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2012.
All research outputs
#15,247,248
of 22,671,366 outputs
Outputs from BMC Systems Biology
#644
of 1,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,348
of 164,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Systems Biology
#23
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,671,366 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,142 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.