You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A double-blind, randomized pilot study for comparison of Melissa officinalis L. and Lavandula angustifolia Mill. with Fluoxetine for the treatment of depression
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12906-020-03003-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mostafa Araj-Khodaei, Ahmad Ali Noorbala, Reza Yarani, Fatemeh Emadi, Elham Emaratkar, Soghrat Faghihzadeh, Zahra Parsian, Fatemeh Alijaniha, Mohammad Kamalinejad, Mohsen Naseri |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 22% |
| Austria | 1 | 11% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 33% |
| Scientists | 2 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 118 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 8% |
| Researcher | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Professor | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 17% |
| Unknown | 58 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 4% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 12% |
| Unknown | 59 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2020.
All research outputs
#7,124,859
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#1,113
of 3,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,437
of 431,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#10
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.