↓ Skip to main content

Group based diabetes self-management education compared to routine treatment for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. A systematic review with meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
507 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
790 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Group based diabetes self-management education compared to routine treatment for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. A systematic review with meta-analysis
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, July 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-12-213
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aslak Steinsbekk, LisbethØ Rygg, Monde Lisulo, Marit B Rise, Atle Fretheim

Abstract

Diabetes self-management education (DSME) can be delivered in many forms. Group based DSME is widespread due to being a cheaper method and the added advantages of having patient meet and discuss with each other. assess effects of group-based DSME compared to routine treatment on clinical, lifestyle and psychosocial outcomes in type-2 diabetes patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 790 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 4 <1%
Indonesia 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 771 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 140 18%
Student > Bachelor 87 11%
Student > Postgraduate 83 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 82 10%
Researcher 60 8%
Other 160 20%
Unknown 178 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 272 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 125 16%
Social Sciences 44 6%
Psychology 31 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 20 3%
Other 103 13%
Unknown 195 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2015.
All research outputs
#6,624,820
of 23,576,969 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#3,151
of 7,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,653
of 165,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#41
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,576,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,851 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.