↓ Skip to main content

Development and characterization of nuclear microsatellite markers for Eremanthus erythropappus and their transferability across related species

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Research, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development and characterization of nuclear microsatellite markers for Eremanthus erythropappus and their transferability across related species
Published in
Biological Research, July 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40659-020-00298-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucas Fernandes Rocha, Natália Ribeiro Paula, Alison Gonçalves Nazareno, Dulcinéia de Carvalho

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 22%
Student > Postgraduate 2 22%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Unknown 4 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 1 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 11%
Unknown 6 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2020.
All research outputs
#15,994,649
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Biological Research
#245
of 642 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#245,973
of 430,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Research
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 642 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,586 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.