You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Eating disorder diagnostics in the digital era: validation of the Norwegian version of the Eating Disorder Assessment for DSM-5 (EDA-5)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Eating Disorders, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40337-020-00310-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Camilla Lindvall Dahlgren, B. Timothy Walsh, Karianne Vrabel, Cecilie Siegwarth, Øyvind Rø |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Norway | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 32% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 16% |
| Unknown | 3 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 5 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 16% |
| Unknown | 5 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2020.
All research outputs
#13,609,469
of 23,220,133 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Eating Disorders
#574
of 820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,741
of 396,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Eating Disorders
#16
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,220,133 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 820 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.