↓ Skip to main content

Upfront surgical resection for primary bone tumors: rationale and potential benefits

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical and Experimental Pathology, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Upfront surgical resection for primary bone tumors: rationale and potential benefits
Published in
Surgical and Experimental Pathology, February 2020
DOI 10.1186/s42047-020-0057-4
Authors

Yoav S. Zvi, Amit Singla, Alexander J. Chou, Janet Tingling, Rui Yang, Bang H. Hoang, David S. Geller

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2020.
All research outputs
#13,997,815
of 23,220,133 outputs
Outputs from Surgical and Experimental Pathology
#19
of 33 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,900
of 361,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical and Experimental Pathology
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,220,133 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one scored the same or higher as 14 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.