You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Walks4work: Rationale and study design to investigate walking at lunchtime in the workplace setting
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-550 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel K Brown, Jo L Barton, Jules Pretty, Valerie F Gladwell |
| Abstract |
Following recruitment of a private sector company, an 8 week lunchtime walking intervention was implemented to examine the effect of the intervention on modifiable cardiovascular disease risk factors, and further to see if walking environment had any further effect on the cardiovascular disease risk factors. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Egypt | 1 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Canada | 1 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 244 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 238 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 41 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 15% |
| Researcher | 23 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 43 | 18% |
| Unknown | 65 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 11% |
| Sports and Recreations | 21 | 9% |
| Psychology | 20 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 20 | 8% |
| Other | 35 | 14% |
| Unknown | 74 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2017.
All research outputs
#2,815,520
of 25,750,437 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#3,469
of 17,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,854
of 179,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#45
of 341 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,750,437 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,807 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 341 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.