You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Characterization of yellow root cassava and food products: investigation of cyanide and β-carotene concentrations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Research Notes, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13104-020-05175-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chiemela S. Odoemelam, Benita Percival, Zeeshan Ahmad, Ming-Wei Chang, Dawn Scholey, Emily Burton, Polycarp N. Okafor, Philippe B. Wilson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 14% |
| Researcher | 6 | 14% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 14 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 16 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2022.
All research outputs
#14,238,195
of 22,828,180 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#1,954
of 4,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,627
of 396,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#36
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,828,180 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,264 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,025 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.