You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Household knowledge, attitudes and practices related to pet contact and associated zoonoses in Ontario, Canada
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, July 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-553 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jason W Stull, Andrew S Peregrine, Jan M Sargeant, J Scott Weese |
Abstract |
Many human infections are transmitted through contact with animals (zoonoses), including household pets. Although pet ownership is common in most countries and non-pet owners may have frequent contact with pets, there is limited knowledge of the public's pet contact practices and awareness of zoonotic disease risks from pets. The objective of this study was to characterize the general public's knowledge, attitudes and risks related to pet ownership and animal contact in southern Ontario, Canada. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 2 | 50% |
United States | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 2 | <1% |
United States | 2 | <1% |
Turkey | 1 | <1% |
Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Chile | 1 | <1% |
Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
Argentina | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 191 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 30 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 29 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 12% |
Researcher | 16 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 6% |
Other | 44 | 22% |
Unknown | 46 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 43 | 21% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 17% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 16% |
Social Sciences | 10 | 5% |
Environmental Science | 7 | 3% |
Other | 20 | 10% |
Unknown | 55 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2020.
All research outputs
#2,547,280
of 22,671,366 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,900
of 14,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,198
of 164,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#48
of 331 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,671,366 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,752 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 331 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.