↓ Skip to main content

Ventilatory support in critically ill hematology patients with respiratory failure

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ventilatory support in critically ill hematology patients with respiratory failure
Published in
Critical Care, July 2012
DOI 10.1186/cc11438
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rosario Molina, Teresa Bernal, Marcio Borges, Rafael Zaragoza, Juan Bonastre, Rosa María Granada, Juan Carlos Rodriguez-Borregán, Karla Núñez, Iratxe Seijas, Ignacio Ayestaran, Guillermo M Albaiceta, the EMEHU study investigators

Abstract

ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION: Hematology patients admitted to the ICU frequently experience respiratory failure and require mechanical ventilation. Noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) may decrease the risk of intubation, but NIMV failure poses its own risks. METHODS: To establish the impact of ventilatory management and NIMV failure on outcome, data from a prospective, multicenter, observational study were analyzed. All hematology patients admitted to one of the 34 participating ICUs in a 17-month period were followed up. Data on demographics, diagnosis, severity, organ failure, and supportive therapies were recorded. A logistic regression analysis was done to evaluate the risk factors associated with death and NIVM failure. RESULTS: Of 450 patients, 300 required ventilatory support. A diagnosis of congestive heart failure and the initial use of NIMV significantly improved survival, whereas APACHE II score, allogeneic transplantation, and NIMV failure increased the risk of death. The risk factors associated with NIMV success were age, congestive heart failure, and bacteremia. Patients with NIMV failure experienced a more severe respiratory impairment than did those electively intubated. CONCLUSIONS: NIMV improves the outcome of hematology patients with respiratory insufficiency, but NIMV failure may have the opposite effect. A careful selection of patients with rapidly reversible causes of respiratory failure may increase NIMV success.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 4%
Spain 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 74 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 15%
Student > Master 11 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 11%
Student > Postgraduate 7 9%
Other 7 9%
Other 21 26%
Unknown 13 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 70%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 1%
Decision Sciences 1 1%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 16 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2012.
All research outputs
#14,387,227
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,748
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,058
of 178,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#50
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,823 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.