| Title |
D-dimer as a biomarker for disease severity and mortality in COVID-19 patients: a case control study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Intensive Care, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40560-020-00466-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yumeng Yao, Jiatian Cao, Qingqing Wang, Qingfeng Shi, Kai Liu, Zhe Luo, Xiang Chen, Sisi Chen, Kaihuan Yu, Zheyong Huang, Bijie Hu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 14% |
| France | 2 | 6% |
| India | 2 | 6% |
| Comoros | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Russia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 16 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 78% |
| Scientists | 5 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 839 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 839 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 124 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 79 | 9% |
| Other | 57 | 7% |
| Researcher | 56 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 54 | 6% |
| Other | 126 | 15% |
| Unknown | 343 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 245 | 29% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 51 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 30 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 30 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 25 | 3% |
| Other | 97 | 12% |
| Unknown | 361 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 119. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2024.
All research outputs
#360,255
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intensive Care
#9
of 585 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,281
of 431,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intensive Care
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 585 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.